SCOUT ACTIVITY — ARE THE AGENTS EARNING THEIR KEEP?

Twelve scouts, mixed quality. One is broken and one has a bad brief; both are visible before you read a row. Accept rate is measured on Review-lane items only — Skim is never rejected, so it carries no signal — and every row edits in place: brief, cadence, pause, drop. Click any scout to open it.

scout activity — consolidation-vault

⌘K

⌂

▤

◈

⌖

◻

REVIEW QUEUE

214 waiting

median age 4d · oldest 19d
skim is a feed and has no depth

COVERAGE GAPS open questions no scout is briefed on

SOURCE HEALTH

10 parsing cleanly · 1 stale · 1 broken
density-watch: 27 runs, 0 proposals

SCOUT

WATCHING

CADENCE

PROPOSED

ACCEPT RATE · 12 WEEKS

COST / RUN

ACTIONS

● {{ s.id }}

BRIEF {{ s.briefNote }}

LINKED QUESTIONS

+ question

save brief · next run tonight dry run against last week {{ s.dryNote }}

! {{ s.diagnosisText }}

ACCEPT RATE · REVIEW LANE ONLY {{ s.chartNote }}

12 weeks ago6now

RUNS · 30D{{ s.runs30 }}

SPEND · 30D{{ s.spend30 }}

TOKENS / RUN{{ s.tokens }}

SOURCE{{ s.healthLabel }}

cost is per run, not per proposal — proposals are near-free once a run has happened

Accept rate counts Review-lane decisions only. Skim items are never rejected, so including them would let a scout improve its number by proposing more of what you ignore.

A low rate is a brief problem, not a scout problem — which is why the brief is a text field on this row rather than a settings page two clicks away.